What is true about peer boundaries?

The statement that authority and power can differ among peers is true because, while peers share a common experience of mental health challenges or recovery, their levels of authority and influence can vary based on their background, expertise, or role within a system. For instance, one peer may have specific training, certifications, or life experiences that provide them with a different perspective or level of trust among those they support. Recognizing that authority and influence are not equal among peers allows for a more nuanced understanding of group dynamics and the roles individuals play, enhancing the effectiveness of peer support interactions.

In contrast, saying that all peers have equal authority oversimplifies the diverse nature of peer relationships and can lead to confusion in roles and responsibilities. The idea that peer boundaries are irrelevant undermines the importance of maintaining a professional relationship and clarifying roles within the peer support framework. Finally, equating peer boundaries with friendship boundaries fails to acknowledge the distinct nature of each relationship type; peer boundaries are grounded in shared recovery experiences and focused support, while friendship boundaries often revolve around personal and emotional connections.